Hey everyone! In this short post I share with you the preliminary item drops from the Halloween Surprise Pile that's coming to Wartune on October 27th. It has a daily…
Gachapon 300 Item Drops and Points
Hi everyone! In this article I share with you 300 item drops from Gachapon (a Wartune feature loaded in Patch 7.8) which was launched today. This data is thanks to Henrik – thank you for sharing.
To open Gachapon one time it will cost 20 balens, but to open it 10 times has a discount so it will cost 190 balens and not 200.
For the 30 x 10 item rewards below the total number of points yielded was 3805.
And so:
- 190 balens for 10
- 1900 balens for 100
- 5700 balens for 300 which yielded 3805 points so that’s 1.5 balens per 1 point
Below I link to the pictures I posted on my social media pages, hopefully it works:
Gachapon Item Drops Picture 1 of 10

Gachapon Item Drops Picture 2 of 10

Gachapon Item Drops Picture 3 of 10

Picture 4 of 10

Picture 5 of 10

Picture 6 of 10

Picture 7 of 10

Picture 8 of 10

Picture 9 of 10

Picture 10 of 10

Matched Links from DolyGames Sites / Google
NOTE:
Thanks to Patrons supporting COSMOS Wartune blog & DolyGames gaming portal & the games that I create for people to play for free.Please consider supporting via Patreon.
[mailpoet_form id="2"]













![[Patron Exclusive] My BEST Dragonchant Skills Selection (2)](https://wartune.dolygames.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Patron-Exclusive-My-BEST-Dragonchant-Skills-Selection-2-248x162.jpg)

No pictures.
lol…my computer can’t process the pictures too. I’ll need to look at it a different way
I can see all the pictures just fine
For those who cannot see pictures maybe you can see them on my social pages:
Twitter page is: https://twitter.com/Wartune_COSMOS
the FB page is https://www.facebook.com/Wartune.DolyGames
– COSMOS
Sorry, correct me if I’m wrong, if 5700 balens got a yield of 3805 points wouldn’t it be around 1 point per 1.5 balen and not 1.5 point per 1 balen? Maybe I misread some part of it, please let me know if so.
Thanks, fixed, I was rushing to get the article published mixed up the words, all the numbers remain correct like you wrote also